Physics Department Seminar | University of Alaska Fairbanks |
|
|
J O U R N A L C L U B |
|
Why are we still studying the aurora? |
by |
Don Hampton |
GI, Optical Science Manager Poker Flat Research Range |
You may (or may
not) be surprised how often and from whom I have heard this question
(to be revealed at the talk). There are really two questions lurking
in the title. The first is basically – why do we spend money
studying the aurora, period? The second is basically – after
50+ years of constant study, don’t we know all we need to know
about the aurora? In tough economic times we should expect plenty of
scrutiny as to why research funding should be spent on items that may
not appear to directly apply to current public concerns. Thus, I will
try to answer the questions by first describing why, other than being
marvelous to look at, the aurora is important – namely that it
is a plasma process, and why we should care about plasmas. I will also
highlight a few of the many important discoveries over the last 50+
years, new results from the last few years, and what we might expect
to uncover in the near future. My goal is to have (unlike last time)
a ready answer for the next time someone asks, “Why are we still
studying the aurora?”
|
||
Friday, 11 Nov. 2011 | ||
Note this week: GI Auditorium, Elvey Building | ||
3:45 PM |